What do the Changes to Michigan’s Auto Insurance Law Mean for You?
The most significant amendments to the Michigan No-Fault law take effect on July 1, 2020. For the past year, the headlines have been filled with news about changes to the Michigan auto insurance law. There has been repeated mention of the expense of automobile insurance and the need for reform. What do the changes mean for you, your family or your business? We may not give it much thought, but driving and riding in a car have great risk – risk of injury, as well as risk of being sued for the negligent driver or owner.
The following is a brief explanation of the big changes happening to Michigan law governing car accidents.
Michigan Law
Michigan law has required, and will continue to require, an owner of an automobile to obtain automobile insurance, including mandatory Personal Injury Protection (PIP) and bodily injury coverages. PIP coverage is essentially coverage that you obtain to pay for your own medical treatment and wage loss (among other benefits) if you are injured in a car accident. The “no-fault” part of the name refers to the fact that your own insurance provides these benefits regardless of if you were at fault in an accident. Bodily injury coverage is essentially the insurance that protects you if you are at fault in an accident and get sued by someone you injured.
PIP Coverage
Arguably the biggest change to the law is that Michigan residents will no longer be required to buy lifetime medical expense coverage for injuries sustained in a car accident. If you do not purchase lifetime PIP medical expense coverage, there will be an option for tiered coverage, either at $500,000 or $250,000. A $50,000 or even an opt out provision is also available for some people with Medicaid, Medicare or other coverages. This means, for example, that for a reduced premium you could decide to obtain $250,000 in PIP medical expense coverage, in which case your insurance would only pay up to $250,000 in medical expenses on your behalf and you would be liable for any additional medical expenses.
Due to these changes, your insurance carrier will now be providing you with forms to fill out in order to select your tier coverage and to affirmatively state your understanding that you may be selecting less than lifetime medical expense coverage.
Should you decide to elect less than full medical expense coverage in reliance on your private health insurance, remember that you may need to change your auto insurance coverage if you have a change in employment or health insurance coverage. Similarly, if you choose to opt out, you will need to change your auto insurance coverage within 30 days if you no longer qualify for Medicaid or Medicare.
Significantly, out-of-state residents are now excluded from qualifying for PIP benefits. However, there is an exception for an out-of-state resident who owns a motor vehicle registered in Michigan.
For an employee injured in a motor vehicle accident in the course of employment, the PIP changes are largely inapplicable since workers’ compensation benefits are generally primary over PIP benefits in Michigan.
Negligence Coverage
A less publicized change is that the required amount of bodily injury coverage is being raised from $20,000 per person/$40,000 per accident to $250,000 per person/$500,000 per accident, with an option to reduce it to $50,000 per person/$100,000 per accident. These are the amounts that your insurance will pay to protect you per person or per accident (if more than one person is injured) should you be sued for your negligence.
Another important change is the recoverable damages. Currently, Michigan law limits the recovery in a bodily injury case to damages for pain and suffering, as well as excess wage loss. However, now an injured person will also be able to recover excess PIP expenses from you if he or she chose a PIP tier less than unlimited. This means that, as an owner or driver of an automobile in Michigan, we will also have exposure for the medical expenses incurred by someone we injure due to our negligence in a car accident.
Will These Changes Save You Money?
Will these changes save you money? Maybe not. The general idea of these changes is that the lack of required lifetime PIP medical expenses should decrease the cost of car insurance. However, the increased exposure and higher required bodily injury limits may cause an increase in cost which offsets the savings on the PIP side. There are other changes being made, such as limiting how insurance carriers are able to set premiums and a fee schedule for medical expenses, which are designed to decrease the cost of the overall insurance, but this begs the question of whether you should opt for anything less than lifetime PIP medical expenses.
In the big picture, the savings for opting for tiered PIP coverage rather than lifetime coverage is relatively minimal. The new law requires a 25% to 35% decrease on the PIP portion of your car insurance premium, but this should not be confused with a decrease in your full auto insurance premium.
As an example, I recently reviewed the premium for my 22-year-old daughter’s insurance for her 2018 Fusion. She pays approximately $1,050 every six months; of which only $155 is allocated for PIP. Were she to opt for the $250,000 PIP expense tier, she would save 35% on that portion of her premium, which equates to a savings of approximately $54. Granted, there is an associated payment for the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (the MCCA -the entity that exists to pay for medical expenses for people catastrophically injured in car accident) of $100 which will be reduced or eliminated depending on the coverage you choose. The real question is whether that savings of $150 to $200 is worth the sacrifice of a lifetime medical expense benefit.
This is more than a dollars and cents decision. You should think about what happens if you opt for tiered coverage, are involved in a serious car accident, and incur medical expenses or need treatment in excess of your limited PIP coverage. How will you pay for this “excess” treatment? Will you even be able to receive the excess treatment? One option may be private health insurance – but you will need to make sure that your health insurance covers automobile accidents. Think about this – will you have private health insurance? Many get their health insurance coverage through employment. What if you are no longer able to work and no longer have private health insurance? What if you have private health insurance, but have a high deductible and cannot afford to treat? Automobile insurance does not include copays or deductibles. What about your choice of doctors or facilities? There are no restrictions on choice of doctors or facilities under the No-Fault system. What if you do not have private health insurance? You are then potentially looking at Medicaid, Medicare or, possibly, bankruptcy.
What Should You Do?
Most importantly, consider your own specific life situation and financial needs. Beyond just talking about the costs for certain packages, talk with your insurance agent to decide what makes the most sense for you, your family and your business.
To have insurance protection approaching what you had before these changes, you would need to opt for unlimited PIP coverage and consider raising or maintaining your bodily injury limits at an appropriate level. Remember, keeping the same bodily injury limits as before the changes really is not the same amount of coverage because there is additional exposure. Additionally, if you do not already have uninsured and underinsured motorist benefits, talk to your agent about these important benefits that provide protection if you are injured by someone who is either uninsured or does not have enough insurance to cover your injuries in a car accident.
Another consideration is an umbrella policy which can provide “extra” coverage that would be applicable to various types of policies, such as auto and homeowners. Keep in mind that many insurers offer reduced premiums when you purchase multiple policies.
Insurance is expensive. However, unless you absolutely cannot afford automobile insurance without opting for the lesser protections available under the new No-Fault law, we highly recommend that you consider retaining lifetime PIP medical expense coverage, as well as appropriate negligence coverages.
Joel Ashton focuses his practice on insurance defense, including Michigan No-Fault claims (PIP, automobile negligence, uninsured/ underinsured motorist), as well as premises liability and general negligence. His practice also includes the defense of contract and liability claims, contract interpretation issues, subrogation claims involving automobile, fire and casualty, commercial and related coverage. Mr. Ashton maintains an AV Preeminent Rating from Martindale-Hubbell, which is the highest possible rating an attorney can achieve for both ethical standards and legal ability. He may be reached at (734) 261-2400 or jashton@cmda-law.com.
CMDA Law
Recent Posts
- Michigan Expands its Earned Sick Time Law and Increases Minimum Wage
- Richards’ Article on Medicaid Estate Recovery Featured in Urban Aging News
- Jim Acho Guest on WJR Morning and Afternoon Shows to Discuss New NCAA NIL Lawsuit
- Jim Acho Files Landmark NCAA Class Action Suit
- Livonia Attorneys Participate in Detroit Mercy Law School’s On-Campus Interviews
Recent Comments
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- January 2010
- January 2009
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Categories
- 50th Anniversary
- Allan C. Vander Laan
- Appeals and Litigation
- Appeals and Litigation Articles
- Barbara M. Moore
- Business Law
- Business Law Articles
- Carol A. Smith
- Christopher G. Schultz
- Community Association & Real Estate Law Practice Group
- Community Association and Real Estate Law Articles
- Community Association Law
- Daniel W. Ferris
- Douglas Curlew
- Education Law
- Education Law Articles
- Employment and Labor Law
- Employment and Labor Law Articles
- Estate Planning and Elder Law
- Estate Planning and Elder Law Articles
- Firm News
- Gary D. Klein
- Gerald C. Davis
- Gregory A. Roberts
- Gregory R. Grant
- Haider A. Kazim
- Insurance Defense
- Insurance Defense Articles
- Isa M. Kasoga
- Jacklyn P. Paletta
- James R. Acho
- James W. Taylor II
- Jeffrey R. Clark
- Joel Ashton
- John "Jay" Gillen
- John D Gwyn
- John M. McFarland
- Joshua J. Cervantes
- Kenneth M. Gonko
- Kevin J. Campbell
- Kimberly M. Coschino
- Kristen L. Rewa
- Latest News
- Law Enforcement Defense and Litigation Articles
- Law Enforcement Litigation and Defense
- Linda Davis Friedland
- Litigation
- Margaret A. Lourdes
- Matthew C. Wayne
- Matthew W. Cross
- Michael O. Cummings
- Michelle L. Richards
- Municipal Law
- Municipal Law Articles
- News & Events for Business Law
- News & Events for Municipal Law
- News Archive
- Norman E. Richards
- Owen J. Cummings
- Patrick R. Sturdy
- Plaintiff's Personal Injury
- Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Articles
- Presentations & Articles
- Published Articles
- Ray E. Richards II
- Real Estate Law
- Robert J. Hahn
- Robert L. Blamer
- Ronald G. Acho
- Ryan D. Miller
- Sarah L. Overton
- Shane R. Nolan
- Stanley I. Okoli
- Stephen C. Johnston
- Suzanne P. Bartos
- Timothy S. Ferrand
- Uncategorized
- Utility Law
- Utility Law Articles
Leave a Reply