The Legal Implications of the State of Michigan Adopting the Uniform Partition of Heirs of Property Act
An important issue currently facing many Michiganians who inherit real estate is how they will be able to preserve their wealth moving forward. In many situations where families do not plan appropriately, there are no due process protections in place for heirs of property owners, and they remain vulnerable to court-ordered partitions. This can occur when an interested party, outside of a family relationship, has a fractional interest in the property and can then force a sale of the property pursuant to their existing right as a tenant in common.
Currently, House Bill 4924 is being considered by the Michigan Legislature for enactment of the Uniform Partition of Heirs of Property Act (UPHPA) which seeks to address these types of issues. This bill is based on a Uniform Act produced nationally by the Uniform Law Commission. This group is a non-profit organization formed in 1892 to draft non-partisan legislation and seeks uniformity for adoption amongst the states. So far, about half of the states have already enacted the UPHPA.
The UPHPA is designed to address issues related to heirs’ real property, which often arise in situations where land has been passed down through generations without clear legal documentation or formalized estate planning. This can lead to disputes among heirs regarding ownership, management, and disposition of the property. Wealthier families often use sophisticated estate planning techniques to create trusts or LLCs to hold their property and ensure their land remains under family control. However, property owners without access to professional guidance are more likely to use a simple will to pass assets to their heirs or to die intestate without a will. In either case, the owner’s descendants will take ownership of the real estate as tenants in common. There are certain requirements in these situations where (1) there is no written partition agreement; (2) at least one co-tenant acquired title from a relative; and (3) 20% or more of the owners or interests are related.
The UPHPA seeks to provide a framework for resolving disputes over heirs’ property in a fair and equitable manner. Its intention is to protect the interests of all heirs while promoting the efficient and orderly administration of estates. Key provisions of the UPHPA typically include procedures for initiating partition actions, guidelines for determining fair market value, and mechanisms for facilitating buyouts or sales of fractional interests.
Forced sales usually bring sparse returns. Court-ordered auction procedures are not designed to receive the highest possible purchase price, but rather to sell the property as quickly as possible. An auction might be conducted with minimal notice to the public, not much opportunity to inspect the property, and no opportunity for bidders to finance their purchase if bids must be paid in cash soon after the auction is completed. Throughout this process, a “speculator” (often a developer) may be able to buy other siblings’ interests, for example, at a price far below the property’s fair market value. In the end, the siblings who wanted to maintain their family property lose their land and a significant part of their inherited wealth.
This is another instance where current law governing tenancies in common leaves heirs’ property vulnerable to devastating court-ordered forced sales. The proposed adoption of the UPHPA in Michigan seeks to address the broader social and economic implications of the inheritance of property, including its disproportionate impact on minority and low-income communities. In our area, statistics have shown that the citizens of the City of Detroit are greatly affected by these situations, more so than their neighbors in the surrounding suburbs. Thus, the effectiveness of the UPHPA will assist those most in need in Southeast Michigan in addressing systemic inequities and promoting land tenure security for some of its more vulnerable populations.
It is important to note that the UPHPA will not prevent a willing seller from selling their property to a buyer. The statute only protects landowners who want to keep their property from being forced to sale. The bill does so by providing a series of reasonable court procedures designed to inform heirs of their rights and give those who wish to retain family-owned real estate the opportunity to do so without unduly restricting the rights of heirs who wish to sell their inheritance.
John D. Gwyn is an attorney in our Livonia office where he focuses his practice on the representation of community associations, management companies and developers with a particular emphasis on real estate and commercial litigation. He has handled many types of community association related matters, including assessment collections, lien foreclosures, bylaw violations, civil rights defense, and creditor bankruptcy matters.
He has gained experience in community association law over the years through his representation of condominium and homeowners associations, as well as individual homeowners, in matters involving real estate, contract, and construction defect litigation issues. His extensive litigation and transactional background provides him with the experience necessary to handle even the most complex legal issues that neighborhood associations may encounter. He may be reached at (734) 261-2400 or jgwyn@cmda-law.com.
CMDA Law
Recent Posts
- Michigan Expands its Earned Sick Time Law and Increases Minimum Wage
- Richards’ Article on Medicaid Estate Recovery Featured in Urban Aging News
- Jim Acho Guest on WJR Morning and Afternoon Shows to Discuss New NCAA NIL Lawsuit
- Jim Acho Files Landmark NCAA Class Action Suit
- Livonia Attorneys Participate in Detroit Mercy Law School’s On-Campus Interviews
Recent Comments
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- January 2010
- January 2009
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Categories
- 50th Anniversary
- Allan C. Vander Laan
- Appeals and Litigation
- Appeals and Litigation Articles
- Barbara M. Moore
- Business Law
- Business Law Articles
- Carol A. Smith
- Christopher G. Schultz
- Community Association & Real Estate Law Practice Group
- Community Association and Real Estate Law Articles
- Community Association Law
- Daniel W. Ferris
- Douglas Curlew
- Education Law
- Education Law Articles
- Employment and Labor Law
- Employment and Labor Law Articles
- Estate Planning and Elder Law
- Estate Planning and Elder Law Articles
- Firm News
- Gary D. Klein
- Gerald C. Davis
- Gregory A. Roberts
- Gregory R. Grant
- Haider A. Kazim
- Insurance Defense
- Insurance Defense Articles
- Isa M. Kasoga
- Jacklyn P. Paletta
- James R. Acho
- James W. Taylor II
- Jeffrey R. Clark
- Joel Ashton
- John "Jay" Gillen
- John D Gwyn
- John M. McFarland
- Joshua J. Cervantes
- Kenneth M. Gonko
- Kevin J. Campbell
- Kimberly M. Coschino
- Kristen L. Rewa
- Latest News
- Law Enforcement Defense and Litigation Articles
- Law Enforcement Litigation and Defense
- Linda Davis Friedland
- Litigation
- Margaret A. Lourdes
- Matthew C. Wayne
- Matthew W. Cross
- Michael O. Cummings
- Michelle L. Richards
- Municipal Law
- Municipal Law Articles
- News & Events for Business Law
- News & Events for Municipal Law
- News Archive
- Norman E. Richards
- Owen J. Cummings
- Patrick R. Sturdy
- Plaintiff's Personal Injury
- Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Articles
- Presentations & Articles
- Published Articles
- Ray E. Richards II
- Real Estate Law
- Robert J. Hahn
- Robert L. Blamer
- Ronald G. Acho
- Ryan D. Miller
- Sarah L. Overton
- Shane R. Nolan
- Stanley I. Okoli
- Stephen C. Johnston
- Suzanne P. Bartos
- Timothy S. Ferrand
- Uncategorized
- Utility Law
- Utility Law Articles
Leave a Reply