Force Majeure Clauses in Commercial Leases in the Age of the Covid-19 Pandemic
The Coronavirus Pandemic has unfavorably affected many Michigan businesses over the past several months. The loss of revenue associated with shuttering a business during this ongoing global epidemic is placing a strain on some commercial tenants’ ability to meet payment obligations under the terms of existing commercial leases.
As a result, force majeure clauses contained in commercial lease contracts have increasingly come into play these days. The term “force majeure” translates literally from French as “superior force.” In business circles, the term describes those unforeseen or uncontrollable events (such as war, labor stoppages, or extreme weather) that are not the fault of any party and that make it difficult or impossible to carry out normal business. A company may insert a force majeure clause into a contract to absolve itself from liability in the event it cannot fulfill the terms of a contract for reasons beyond its control. Most of the force majeure clauses contained in commercial leases temporarily delay or excuse performance of obligations, except for the tenant’s obligation to continue to make its lease and Common Area Maintenance (CAM) payments.
The Covid-19 pandemic has now caused many landlords to add certain language such as “viruses and outbreaks of disease” and “pandemic” into their leases for new tenants and as addendums for lease renewal purposes. Some landlords will essentially allow for extensions of time to pay rent. However, most will not relieve rental payment obligations altogether or allow for rescission of the lease in its entirety.
Of course, problems such as these can work both ways too. If the lease in question is a multi-tenant commercial lease, wherein a landlord may be obligated to provide certain services such as janitorial or security services, under the law it will have an obligation to take “commercially reasonable” efforts to protect the public health of its tenants, their guest invitees, and customers.
The law recognizes that landlords owe a duty of reasonable care as to those parts of the property over which they have retained control (i.e. common element areas such as lobbies, parking lots, stairwells, etc.). Even if a lease does not specifically reference an outbreak of a disease as a force majeure event, commercial leases usually provide that any unexpected and unavoidable governmental action shall qualify as a force majeure event. As such, if there is a government-mandated quarantine or restriction on a tenant’s specific business operations in response to the pandemic, a landlord might claim that such government action is a force majeure event that prohibits the landlord from providing the tenant with access to the leased property.
The tenants’ common law legal defenses to these types of clauses are typically frustration of purpose and impossibility. However, in commercial lease contract situations, some courts are reluctant to impose rescission or abatement of rent, absent the existence of a force majeure clause. In general, here are the typical defensive arguments made by tenants in these situations:
Frustration of Purpose: Changed conditions have rendered the performance bargained from the promisee worthless, not because the promisor’s performance has become different or impracticable. (Such an event will usually occur prior to the bargained for performance).
Impossibility: In extreme circumstances, the doctrine of impossibility relieves non-performance, but the party asserting the defense bears the burden of proving a real impossibility and not a mere inconvenience or unexpected difficulty.
To avoid these types of tenant issues, some landlords are taking extraordinary measures as to the common element areas in their buildings to keep people safe. This includes increased cleaning of frequently touched surfaces; installing hand sanitizer stations in common areas; and displaying education materials informing tenants of proper handwashing techniques and cough etiquette.
For the most part, in these unusual times, both commercial landlords and tenants have sought ways to manage their lease obligations. In the spirit of cooperation, responsible businesspersons have shown that they can work with each other, to the best of their ability, until this health crisis passes.
John D. Gwyn focuses his practice on commercial litigation, real estate law, community association law, and municipal law. He has broad and extensive experience of over 25 years in matters involving commercial and consumer litigation primarily focused on the representation of community associations and financial institutions. Mr. Gwyn currently represents developers, condominium and HOA associations regarding matters involving real estate, contract, and construction issues. He has handled all facets of litigation in matters related to bylaw violations enforcement, collections, corporate civil rights defense and creditor bankruptcy matters. Mr. Gwyn has also spent a significant part of his legal career representing banks and credit unions in proceedings related to compliance, negotiable instruments, construction lien foreclosures, receiverships, fraud litigation, probate and collections. He may be reached at (734) 261-2400 or jgwyn@cmda-law.com.
CMDA Law
Recent Posts
- Michigan House Bill 5598: Cracking Down on Fraudulent Real Estate Documents
- Attorney Corey Volmering Joins Firm’s Grand Rapids Office
- Jim Acho Named 2024 MiLW Leader in the Law
- Richards’ Article on the Benefits and Challenges of the Ladybird Deed Featured in Urban Aging News
- Jim Acho Guests on “SportsWise” with NFL Network’s Gabe Feldman to Break Down NCAA Lawsuit
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- January 2010
- January 2009
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Categories
- 50th Anniversary
- Allan C. Vander Laan
- Appeals and Litigation
- Appeals and Litigation Articles
- Barbara M. Moore
- Business Law
- Business Law Articles
- Carol A. Smith
- Christopher G. Schultz
- Community Association & Real Estate Law Practice Group
- Community Association and Real Estate Law Articles
- Community Association Law
- Corey Volmering
- Daniel W. Ferris
- Douglas Curlew
- Education Law
- Education Law Articles
- Employment and Labor Law
- Employment and Labor Law Articles
- Estate Planning and Elder Law
- Estate Planning and Elder Law Articles
- Firm News
- Gary D. Klein
- Gerald C. Davis
- Gregory A. Roberts
- Gregory R. Grant
- Haider A. Kazim
- Insurance Defense
- Insurance Defense Articles
- Isa M. Kasoga
- Jacklyn P. Paletta
- James R. Acho
- James W. Taylor II
- Jeffrey R. Clark
- Joel Ashton
- John "Jay" Gillen
- John D Gwyn
- John M. McFarland
- Joshua J. Cervantes
- Kenneth M. Gonko
- Kevin J. Campbell
- Kimberly M. Coschino
- Kristen L. Rewa
- Latest News
- Law Enforcement Defense and Litigation Articles
- Law Enforcement Litigation and Defense
- Linda Davis Friedland
- Litigation
- Margaret A. Lourdes
- Matthew C. Wayne
- Matthew W. Cross
- Michael O. Cummings
- Michelle L. Richards
- Municipal Law
- Municipal Law Articles
- News & Events for Business Law
- News & Events for Municipal Law
- News Archive
- Norman E. Richards
- Owen J. Cummings
- Patrick R. Sturdy
- Plaintiff's Personal Injury
- Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Articles
- Presentations & Articles
- Published Articles
- Ray E. Richards II
- Real Estate Law
- Robert J. Hahn
- Robert L. Blamer
- Ronald G. Acho
- Ryan D. Miller
- Sarah L. Overton
- Shane R. Nolan
- Stanley I. Okoli
- Stephen C. Johnston
- Suzanne P. Bartos
- Timothy S. Ferrand
- Uncategorized
- Utility Law
- Utility Law Articles
Leave a Reply