Co-Owner’s Complaint of Neighbor’s Smoking in a Condominium Rejected by the Federal Courts
The Federal Appeals panel affirmed an opinion by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan over the granting of Summary Judgment in a condominium case that has broad ramifications. The Plaintiff claimed her Defendant next door neighbor was aggravating her preexisting asthma condition due to the frequent smell of smoke emanating from their unit. This action turned into what is regarded as a landmark case. It relates to issues of major importance to a significant number of people, including those that currently live in community associations. The Opinion rendered by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision and it has yet to be accepted or addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In the case of Davis v. Echo Valley Condominium Association, Plaintiff Davis alleged that the Association refused to ban smoking in the condominium and thereby discriminated against her under the Fair Housing Amendment Act and that there were violations of several condominium bylaws. Ultimately, Summary Judgment was granted in favor of the neighbor Defendants with a final ruling that the requested smoking ban was not considered to be a “reasonable accommodation.”
The opinion is important for future decisions as it may be cited in nearly all lawsuits involving smoke-related nuisances and/or the interpretation and construction of condominium bylaws. The ruling found that Plaintiff Davis did not show that her request qualifies as a “reasonable accommodation,” which means a moderate adjustment to challenge a policy, but not a fundamental change in the policy. The Court ultimately rejected the argument that the requested changes interfere with the rights of third parties because the Association Bylaws did not specifically prohibit or even regulate smoking in the first place.
Plaintiff Davis is a cancer survivor with “a history of asthma and multiple and chemical sensitivity disorders.” In 2004, she purchased a condominium on the second floor of a four unit building in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Then, in 2016 she complained to a management company employee about a neighbor’s constant smoking that affected her “breathing, causing constant coughing, and near asthma attacks.” The Association’s Board of Directors followed up by sending a letter requesting that those who smoke due so on their balcony or further insulate their doors. When complaints continued, a fresh air system was installed in Plaintiff Davis’s duct work. Davis indicated that the system helped but did not fully eliminate the odor.
In July 2017, Davis sued the Association, the Management Company, and the condominium owners, as well as their tenant who had engaged in the smoking activities. The condominium owners then advised the tenant that her lease would be terminated wherein they sold the condominium unit and settled with Davis. As a result, the unit co-owners were ultimately dismissed from the lawsuit. Plaintiff Davis continued with the action against the other defendants and lodged complaints about the smoking activities, including smelling cigarette and marijuana smoke from a new source. The proposed smoking ban was not approved by the co-owners as members of the Association and the District Court indicated that a ban would fundamentally change the Association’s smoking policy by barring residents “from engaging in a lawful activity on their own property.”
The Plaintiff’s attorney was surprised by the Opinion and claimed that it “establishes truly novel legal principles that have frightening implications.” He noted that nowhere in the Bylaws did it “allow” or “permit” smoking. Instead, he indicated that the opinion uses the fact that the Bylaws have some specific prohibitions (for example-no pets) to read all other general provisions out of existence. His conclusion is that the opinion bars all tobacco related nuisance claims in cases where there is no explicit Bylaw, rule, or regulation prohibiting smoking. The result, according to the attorney, is that the opinion may bar nearly all disability-based Fair Housing Amendment Act Claims.
A lesson to be learned by Associations is to take steps now to address these situations before they arise. An Amendment to existing Bylaws to prohibit smoking would be a positive first step, in addition to advising co-owners that smoking is prohibited in common areas. Also, members should be reminded that, as smokers, they and their guest invitees should be courteous to their neighbors in an effort to stop smoke from escaping their unit through vents and unsealed doors leading to common areas.
John D. Gwyn is an attorney in our Livonia office where he focuses his practice on the representation of community associations, management companies and developers with a particular emphasis on real estate and commercial litigation. He has handled many types of community association related matters, including assessment collections, lien foreclosures, bylaw violations, civil rights defense and creditor bankruptcy matters.
Mr. Gwyn has gained experience in community association law over the years through his representation of condominium and homeowners associations, as well as individual homeowners, in matters involving real estate, contract, and construction defect litigation issues. His extensive litigation and transactional background provides him with the experience necessary to handle even the most complex legal issues that neighborhood associations may encounter. He may be reached at (734) 261-2400 or jgwyn@cmda-law.com.
CMDA Law
Recent Posts
- Jim Acho Named 2024 MiLW Leader in the Law
- Richards’ Article on the Benefits and Challenges of the Ladybird Deed Featured in Urban Aging News
- Jim Acho Guests on “SportsWise” with NFL Network’s Gabe Feldman to Break Down NCAA Lawsuit
- Important Reminder: Under the CTA, a BOIR is Required to be Filed by January 1, 2025
- Jim Acho Guest At Premier For New Detroit Lions Book
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- January 2010
- January 2009
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Categories
- 50th Anniversary
- Allan C. Vander Laan
- Appeals and Litigation
- Appeals and Litigation Articles
- Barbara M. Moore
- Business Law
- Business Law Articles
- Carol A. Smith
- Christopher G. Schultz
- Community Association & Real Estate Law Practice Group
- Community Association and Real Estate Law Articles
- Community Association Law
- Daniel W. Ferris
- Douglas Curlew
- Education Law
- Education Law Articles
- Employment and Labor Law
- Employment and Labor Law Articles
- Estate Planning and Elder Law
- Estate Planning and Elder Law Articles
- Firm News
- Gary D. Klein
- Gerald C. Davis
- Gregory A. Roberts
- Gregory R. Grant
- Haider A. Kazim
- Insurance Defense
- Insurance Defense Articles
- Isa M. Kasoga
- Jacklyn P. Paletta
- James R. Acho
- James W. Taylor II
- Jeffrey R. Clark
- Joel Ashton
- John "Jay" Gillen
- John D Gwyn
- John M. McFarland
- Joshua J. Cervantes
- Kenneth M. Gonko
- Kevin J. Campbell
- Kimberly M. Coschino
- Kristen L. Rewa
- Latest News
- Law Enforcement Defense and Litigation Articles
- Law Enforcement Litigation and Defense
- Linda Davis Friedland
- Litigation
- Margaret A. Lourdes
- Matthew C. Wayne
- Matthew W. Cross
- Michael O. Cummings
- Michelle L. Richards
- Municipal Law
- Municipal Law Articles
- News & Events for Business Law
- News & Events for Municipal Law
- News Archive
- Norman E. Richards
- Owen J. Cummings
- Patrick R. Sturdy
- Plaintiff's Personal Injury
- Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Articles
- Presentations & Articles
- Published Articles
- Ray E. Richards II
- Real Estate Law
- Robert J. Hahn
- Robert L. Blamer
- Ronald G. Acho
- Ryan D. Miller
- Sarah L. Overton
- Shane R. Nolan
- Stanley I. Okoli
- Stephen C. Johnston
- Suzanne P. Bartos
- Timothy S. Ferrand
- Uncategorized
- Utility Law
- Utility Law Articles
Leave a Reply