Return to Work Issues under the Family Medical Leave Act
Issue:
An employee has provided a Return to Work Authorization Form from their physician following approved leave pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). FMLA requires the employee to return to their original position.
Question:
Can the employer require the employee to take additional medical and/or work functionality tests before reinstating the employee to their original position? as a condition of restoring employees whose need for leave under the FMLA arose from their own serious health condition.
General Rule:
Employers may require an employee to obtain and present a Fitness-for-Duty Certification from the employee’s health care provider stating the employee is able to resume work. The need for such certification is to be communicated to the employee at the time notice of eligibility for FMLA leave is given.
Additionally, the employer must have a uniformly-applied policy for all similarly-situated employees. As a general rule, the certification needs only to be a simple statement that the employee is able to return to work. If the employer has provided a detailed description of essential job functions, some federal appellate courts have allowed a thorough “functional capacity evaluation.” The nature of the job, safety implications, and uniformity of policy for all similarly situated would be critical factors. For example, a knee injury may trigger the standards for an emergency medical technician, but not for an office clerk.
The employer may contact the employee’s health care provider for purposes of authentication and for clarification after the employee has been given an opportunity to provide the requested information. HIPAA rules for privacy protection do apply.
Checklist for Fitness-for-Duty Certifications:
- Adopt a uniformly-applied policy or procedure requiring Fitness-for-Duty Certifications from all employees who take leave for a health condition, even if they do not take FMLA leave.
- Notify employees of the Fitness-for-Duty Certification policy in the employee handbook and again when an employee is notified that the leave requested qualifies for FMLA protection.
- Do not request Fitness-for-Duty Certifications from employees taking intermittent leave, unless there is a reasonable safety concern and then no more than once every 40 days.
- Be aware that state laws and/or a collective bargaining agreement may present special requirements regarding Fitness-for-Duty Certifications.
- Make certain that the Fitness-for-Duty Certification comes from the employee’s own health care provider.
- Ensure that the Fitness-for-Duty Certification only relates to the particular health condition that caused the employee’s need for FMLA leave.
- Do not delay the employee’s reinstatement pending contract with their health care provider for purposes of clarification of a Fitness-for-Duty Certification.
- Do not request a second or third opinion.
An employee who does not provide a fitness-for-duty certification or who requests additional FMLA leave is no longer entitled to reinstatement under the FMLA.
CMDA Law
Recent Posts
- Attorney Neal Wilds Joins Firm’s Traverse City Office
- Kathy Ueberroth Recipient of Michigan Lawyers Weekly Unsung Legal Hero Award
- Jim Acho Honored at Leaders in the Law Awards Ceremony
- Michigan House Bill 5598: Cracking Down on Fraudulent Real Estate Documents
- Attorney Corey Volmering Joins Firm’s Grand Rapids Office
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- January 2010
- January 2009
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Categories
- 50th Anniversary
- Allan C. Vander Laan
- Appeals and Litigation
- Appeals and Litigation Articles
- Barbara M. Moore
- Business Law
- Business Law Articles
- Carol A. Smith
- Christopher G. Schultz
- Community Association & Real Estate Law Practice Group
- Community Association and Real Estate Law Articles
- Community Association Law
- Corey Volmering
- Daniel W. Ferris
- Douglas Curlew
- Education Law
- Education Law Articles
- Employment and Labor Law
- Employment and Labor Law Articles
- Estate Planning and Elder Law
- Estate Planning and Elder Law Articles
- Firm News
- Gary D. Klein
- Gerald C. Davis
- Gregory A. Roberts
- Gregory R. Grant
- Haider A. Kazim
- Insurance Defense
- Insurance Defense Articles
- Isa M. Kasoga
- Jacklyn P. Paletta
- James R. Acho
- James W. Taylor II
- Jeffrey R. Clark
- Joel Ashton
- John "Jay" Gillen
- John D Gwyn
- John M. McFarland
- Joshua J. Cervantes
- Kenneth M. Gonko
- Kevin J. Campbell
- Kimberly M. Coschino
- Kristen L. Rewa
- Latest News
- Law Enforcement Defense and Litigation Articles
- Law Enforcement Litigation and Defense
- Linda Davis Friedland
- Litigation
- Margaret A. Lourdes
- Matthew C. Wayne
- Matthew W. Cross
- Michael O. Cummings
- Michelle L. Richards
- Municipal Law
- Municipal Law Articles
- Neal A. Wilds
- News & Events for Business Law
- News & Events for Municipal Law
- News Archive
- Norman E. Richards
- Owen J. Cummings
- Patrick R. Sturdy
- Plaintiff's Personal Injury
- Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Articles
- Presentations & Articles
- Published Articles
- Ray E. Richards II
- Real Estate Law
- Robert J. Hahn
- Robert L. Blamer
- Ronald G. Acho
- Ryan D. Miller
- Sarah L. Overton
- Shane R. Nolan
- Stanley I. Okoli
- Stephen C. Johnston
- Suzanne P. Bartos
- Timothy S. Ferrand
- Uncategorized
- Utility Law
- Utility Law Articles