Firearms: Open Carry is Legal in Michigan
Firearms: Open Carry is Legal in Michigan
Earlier this year Nicholas Looman walked into Aderdeen Elementary School in Grand Rapids, Michigan to vote wearing his holstered pistol on his hip. The school officials contacted the police, and Mr. Looman was arrested for bringing a firearm into a school. Later, William Forsythe, the Kent County Prosecutor, issued a statement that Mr. Looman had done nothing illegal because he possessed a valid Concealed Pistol License (CPL), and his pistol had not been concealed.
While it is illegal to carry a concealed firearm into a school under MCL 28.425o, it is perfectly legal to carry this same firearm into a school openly, in full view of the public.
MCL 28.425o provides the following list of “pistol free areas” for those who possess a valid CPL:
- A school or school property.
- A public or private child care center.
- A sports arena or stadium.
- A bar or tavern licensed under the Michigan liquor control code.
- Any property or facility owned or operated by a church, synagogue, mosque, temple or other place of worship.
- An entertainment facility with a seating capacity of 2,500 or more.
- A hospital.
- A dormitory or classroom of a community college, college, or university.
Many people do not realize, however, that the above restrictions apply only to individuals who carry their firearms concealed. They do not apply to people who carry their firearms openly, such as in a holster on their hip.
The Michigan State Police have provided some guidance on their website, by listing the “pistol free zones,” and then adding that a pistol is subject to seizure in these areas only if it is being carried concealed. The website also states that firearms are prohibited in courthouses, per Supreme Court Administrative Order.
At first, it may seem nonsensical that firearms are permitted to be carried openly, in areas where they are prohibited from being carried concealed. To better understand Michigan’s open carry laws, it is best to first understand Michigan’s history.
Open carry has been legal in Michigan since it became a state. Article I, Section 6 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963 states:
“Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.”
Two years before Michigan became a state in 1837, this same language appeared in Article I, Section 13 of the Constitution of Michigan of 1835. Then, during the early part of the 20th Century, Michigan banned the carrying of concealed weapons. The reasoning for this was best explained by the Michigan Court of Appeals in 1975, which stated:
“The purpose of all concealment statutes is clear. At the time they were enacted, the open carrying of weapons upon the person was not prohibited. The purpose of the concealed weapons statutes was to prevent men in sudden quarrel or in the commission of crime from drawing concealed weapons and using them without prior notice to their victims that they were armed. The person assailed or attacked would behave one way if he knew his assailant was armed and perhaps another way if he could safely presume that he was unarmed.”
Historically, only unseen firearms were viewed as a problem in Michigan, not firearms in general. In addition to the CPL statute, the Michigan Penal Code, MCL 750. 234d, provides: except as provided in Subsection 2, a person shall not possess a firearm on the premises of any of the following:
- A depository financial institution or a subsidiary or affiliate of a depository financial institution.
- A church or other house of religious worship.
- A court.
- A theatre.
- A sports arena.
- A day care center.
- A hospital.
- An establishment licensed under the Michigan liquor control act.
(2) This section does not apply to any of the following:
- A person who owns, or is employed by or contracted by, an entity described in Subsection 1 if the possession of that firearm is to provide security services for that entity.
- A peace officer.
- A person licensed by this state or another state to carry a concealed weapon.
- A person who possesses a firearm on the premises of an entity described in subsection (1) if that possession is with the permission of the owner or an agent of the owner of that entity.
Under MCL 750.234d(2)(c), an individual with a valid CPL may carry his firearm into a theater, a bank, a day care center or even a sports arena, so long as his firearm is not concealed. This has been the law in Michigan since 1991. The change leading up to this relatively new open carry controversy, however, was Michigan’s conversion from a “may issue state” to a “shall issue state” in 2001. With this change, county gun boards no longer had the discretion to deny CPLs to qualified applicants. Now CPLs, once reserved for private investigators and individuals who could prove that they needed a concealed pistol for protection, are being obtained by more and more people. The result has been a lot of confusion on the part of law enforcement and those seeking to prevent the carrying of firearms on public property.
The Daily Tribune reported on August 4, 2012 that open carry advocate, Jeffrey Haman settled his lawsuit against the City of Warren. Mr. Haman had been stopped by police and ordered to the ground because he had been carrying his handgun openly in a holster on his hip. Mr. Haman sued the City for $100,000, but settled instead for $5,000 and the City’s agreement to train its police officers about the legality of open carry in Michigan.
This case should serve as a warning to those who intend to use police stops as a means by which to prevent firearms from being carried around in a public area. Mr. Haman had filed his lawsuit for the purpose of educating police departments and the public about open carry in Michigan. The next plaintiff might be motivated by money. Organizations, such as the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners, are spreading the word that arrests made under MCL 750.234d(1), may be successfully challenged in court under MCL 750.234d(2)(c).
The Michigan Court of Appeals has issued an unpublished decision regarding open carry, People of the State of Michigan v. Roger Allen Watkins, which was decided on June 5, 2012.
Mr. Watkins was arrested for openly carrying his pistol in a shoulder harness at the Home and Garden Show on Michigan State University’s campus. Section 18.01 of Michigan State University’s Ordinances prohibits the possession of a firearm anywhere on campus, except as provided by state law. The Circuit Court overturned Mr. Watkins’ conviction, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. While unpublished, this case is significant, because it demonstrates that institutions and police departments are starting to find themselves on the losing end of these open carry challenges.
It is possible that as more citizens start seeing these open carry proponents walking around on public streets, campuses, schools and such with their pistols openly exposed, the more these citizens may start demanding legislative action. Until then, however, open carry is legal in the State of Michigan.
Linda Davis Friedland is an attorney in our Livonia office where she concentrate her practice on Commercial Litigation, Employment and Labor Law, Corporate and Business Law, Estate Planning, Utilities Law and Municipal Law. She can be reached at (734) 261-2400 or lfriedland@cmda-law.com.
CMDA Law
Recent Posts
- Michigan House Bill 5598: Cracking Down on Fraudulent Real Estate Documents
- Attorney Corey Volmering Joins Firm’s Grand Rapids Office
- Jim Acho Named 2024 MiLW Leader in the Law
- Richards’ Article on the Benefits and Challenges of the Ladybird Deed Featured in Urban Aging News
- Jim Acho Guests on “SportsWise” with NFL Network’s Gabe Feldman to Break Down NCAA Lawsuit
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- January 2010
- January 2009
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Categories
- 50th Anniversary
- Allan C. Vander Laan
- Appeals and Litigation
- Appeals and Litigation Articles
- Barbara M. Moore
- Business Law
- Business Law Articles
- Carol A. Smith
- Christopher G. Schultz
- Community Association & Real Estate Law Practice Group
- Community Association and Real Estate Law Articles
- Community Association Law
- Corey Volmering
- Daniel W. Ferris
- Douglas Curlew
- Education Law
- Education Law Articles
- Employment and Labor Law
- Employment and Labor Law Articles
- Estate Planning and Elder Law
- Estate Planning and Elder Law Articles
- Firm News
- Gary D. Klein
- Gerald C. Davis
- Gregory A. Roberts
- Gregory R. Grant
- Haider A. Kazim
- Insurance Defense
- Insurance Defense Articles
- Isa M. Kasoga
- Jacklyn P. Paletta
- James R. Acho
- James W. Taylor II
- Jeffrey R. Clark
- Joel Ashton
- John "Jay" Gillen
- John D Gwyn
- John M. McFarland
- Joshua J. Cervantes
- Kenneth M. Gonko
- Kevin J. Campbell
- Kimberly M. Coschino
- Kristen L. Rewa
- Latest News
- Law Enforcement Defense and Litigation Articles
- Law Enforcement Litigation and Defense
- Linda Davis Friedland
- Litigation
- Margaret A. Lourdes
- Matthew C. Wayne
- Matthew W. Cross
- Michael O. Cummings
- Michelle L. Richards
- Municipal Law
- Municipal Law Articles
- News & Events for Business Law
- News & Events for Municipal Law
- News Archive
- Norman E. Richards
- Owen J. Cummings
- Patrick R. Sturdy
- Plaintiff's Personal Injury
- Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Articles
- Presentations & Articles
- Published Articles
- Ray E. Richards II
- Real Estate Law
- Robert J. Hahn
- Robert L. Blamer
- Ronald G. Acho
- Ryan D. Miller
- Sarah L. Overton
- Shane R. Nolan
- Stanley I. Okoli
- Stephen C. Johnston
- Suzanne P. Bartos
- Timothy S. Ferrand
- Uncategorized
- Utility Law
- Utility Law Articles